UPDATED: 04-03-26 10:21 PDT

men Anderson (SC) 2
  
Anderson (SC)         
W-L: ( 8- 2) PR = 96.6775

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 207 H North Greenville Carolinas ( 8- 5, 92.5) 19-10 214 N Embry-Riddle SSC ( 5- 4, 94.2) 18- 9 225 H Lander PBC ( 5- 7, 90.9) 19-10 228 A Montevallo PBC ( 5- 7, 92.4) 22-16 304 A Mars Hill SAC ( 1- 9, 88.0) 23- 9 307 H Tampa SSC (11- 1, 99.2) 14-13 318 H Wingate SAC ( 8- 1, 97.5) 18-19 321 A Coker SAC ( 6- 5, 90.0) 28-15 324 H Tusculum SAC ( 6- 3, 90.7) 22- 7 328 A Catawba SAC ( 7- 2, 94.7) 12-22 401 H Newberry SAC ( 9- 2, 96.7) 404 H Lincoln Memorial SAC ( 6- 4, 91.2) 411 A Lenoir-Rhyne SAC ( 5- 3, 96.5) 418 H Emory & Henry SAC ( 0- 8, 80.4)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   207 H North Greenville       19-10       9     5           0.47
   214 N Embry-Riddle           18- 9       9     2    +      2.50
   225 H Lander                 19-10       9     6           0.00
   228 A Montevallo             22-16       6     4           1.06
   304 A Mars Hill              23- 9      14     8           0.00
   307 H Tampa                  14-13       1    -2    +      3.15
   318 H Wingate                18-19      -1     0          -0.53
   321 A Coker                  28-15      13     6           0.00
   324 H Tusculum               22- 7      15     6           0.00
   328 A Catawba                12-22     -10     2    ---   -6.60

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   328 A Catawba                12-22     -10     2    ---   -6.60

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   214 N Embry-Riddle           18- 9       9     2    +      2.50
   307 H Tampa                  14-13       1    -2    +      3.15

Anderson (SC) Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Adams State Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Adelphi Adelphi   Adelphi
Alabama-Huntsville Anderson (SC) insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Anderson (SC)
American International Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Assumption Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Barton Anderson (SC) Anderson (SC)   2- 1 vs 0- 3
Belmont Abbey Anderson (SC) tied - ( 4- 2) ( 4- 2) Anderson (SC)
Bentley Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Bridgeport Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Caldwell Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Catawba Catawba Catawba  
Chestnut Hill Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Chowan Anderson (SC) Anderson (SC)   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Coker Anderson (SC) Anderson (SC)  
Colorado Mesa Anderson (SC) insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Anderson (SC)
Concordia-Irvine Anderson (SC) insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Anderson (SC)
D'Youville Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Davenport Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Davis & Elkins Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
District of Columbia Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Dominican (CA) Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Dominican (NY) Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Embry-Riddle Anderson (SC) Anderson (SC)  
Emmanuel (GA) Anderson (SC) Anderson (SC)   5- 0 vs 0- 5
Emory & Henry Anderson (SC) insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Anderson (SC)
Felician Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Flagler Anderson (SC) Anderson (SC)   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Florida Southern Anderson (SC) insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Anderson (SC)
Florida Tech Anderson (SC) insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 2) Anderson (SC)
Franklin Pierce Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Frostburg State Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Georgian Court Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Holy Family Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Indianapolis Anderson (SC) tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Anderson (SC)
Lake Erie Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Lander Anderson (SC) Anderson (SC)  
Lees-McRae Anderson (SC) tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Anderson (SC)
Lenoir-Rhyne Anderson (SC) tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 2) Anderson (SC)
Lewis Lewis   Lewis
Limestone Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Lincoln Memorial Anderson (SC) Anderson (SC)   3- 1 vs 1- 3
Lynn Anderson (SC) insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Anderson (SC)
Malone Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Mars Hill Anderson (SC) Anderson (SC)  
Maryville Anderson (SC) insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Anderson (SC)
Mercy Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Molloy Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Montevallo Anderson (SC) Anderson (SC)  
Mount Olive Anderson (SC) insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Anderson (SC)
Newberry Anderson (SC) tied - ( 3- 1) ( 3- 1) Anderson (SC)
North Greenville Anderson (SC) Anderson (SC)  
Northwood Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Pace Pace   Pace
Palm Beach Atlantic Anderson (SC) tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Anderson (SC)
Post Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Quincy Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Roberts Wesleyan Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Rockhurst Anderson (SC) insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Anderson (SC)
Rollins Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Seton Hill Seton Hill   Seton Hill
Shorter Anderson (SC) insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Anderson (SC)
Southern New Hampshire Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
St Anselm St Anselm   St Anselm
St Leo Anderson (SC) tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Anderson (SC)
St Michaels Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
St Thomas Aquinas Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Tampa Anderson (SC) Anderson (SC)  
Thomas More Anderson (SC) insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Anderson (SC)
Tiffin Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Tusculum Anderson (SC) Anderson (SC)  
Virginia State Anderson (SC) Anderson (SC)   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Walsh Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Westminster (UT) Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Wheeling Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
William Jewell Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Wilmington (DE) Anderson (SC)   Anderson (SC)
Wingate Wingate Wingate  
Young Harris Anderson (SC) Anderson (SC)   4- 0 vs 0- 4

PowerWise = 71


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 9.19

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H North Greenvil  ( 8- 5, 92.5)    19-10       -7.39      15.16      -0.36         0.92            13.60
   0 N Embry-Riddle    ( 5- 4, 94.2)    18- 9       -5.72      16.83      -0.00         0.92            15.47
   0 H Lander          ( 5- 7, 90.9)    19-10       -9.00      13.55      -0.36         0.92            12.12
   0 A Montevallo      ( 5- 7, 92.4)    22-16       -7.52      15.03       0.36         0.92            14.15
   0 A Mars Hill       ( 1- 9, 88.0)    23- 9      -11.93      10.63       0.36         0.92            10.10
   0 H Tampa           (11- 1, 99.2)    14-13       -0.71      21.84      -0.36         0.92            19.74
   0 H Wingate         ( 8- 1, 97.5)    18-19       -2.39      20.16      -0.36         0.92            -2.53
   0 A Coker           ( 6- 5, 90.0)    28-15       -9.89      12.67       0.36         0.92            11.97
   0 H Tusculum        ( 6- 3, 90.7)    22- 7       -9.20      13.35      -0.36         0.92            11.93
   0 A Catawba         ( 7- 2, 94.7)    12-22       -5.18      17.37       0.36         0.92            -4.43
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       102.12

winning pts = 109.0780 losing points = -6.9628

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------